The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Jul 14, 2015 8:56:50 GMT -5
We all know that these SJW women are the types of women who resent their genetic superiors because men value them more. They know we don't care about their "smarts' (liberal brainwashing) because all the things that matter are done by men. This goes deeper than "bitter ugly broad" this goes into these women knowing they have nothing of value to offer society and they feel worthless.
What feminist ever made anything that changed civilization? The things that make civilization run and improve upon it are all done by men. Women didn't make the automobile, they don't advance medicine and electronics like men do. Even the bottom tier of men in terms of wealth, creativity, intelligence, and work ethic do the jobs that maintain, and keep society going whereas women do jobs that are just there to fill up space or are in child care.
So if they don't have looks, what else do they have? They resent men for being more capable, and resent women for being more attractive. A sad fate indeed.
White Knight Betas are losers who can't compete with men in the sexual marketplace due to inferior genetics and earning ability, so they just simp out which is just pathetic. It's pretty clear what they're after.
|
|
|
Post by JACK-2 on Jul 14, 2015 9:52:49 GMT -5
They sim and destroy the market which ruins their chances.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Jul 14, 2015 10:00:35 GMT -5
They sim and destroy the market which ruins their chances. Yea the male thing is obvious but I think the women just feel worthless because they can't do what a man can do and they can't get women.
|
|
|
Post by JACK-2 on Jul 14, 2015 10:02:45 GMT -5
Well, women are worthless outside of child bearing.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Jul 14, 2015 10:05:33 GMT -5
Well, women are worthless outside of child bearing. But women who are more attractive can get desirable men. Women who are ugly cannot and they're resentful. Women can get by off of their reproductive ability and don't have to learn anything, whereas a poor guy who is ugly and beta really has nothing and has to rely on monogamy to get laid if that. This SJW stuff and PC stuff is for lower status men and women, the bottom rung. It's for losers which is why they like it so much.
|
|
|
Post by JACK-2 on Jul 14, 2015 10:55:44 GMT -5
True, but betas can increase their value to society through contribution. Women only have their reproductive capacity.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Jul 14, 2015 11:01:55 GMT -5
True, but betas can increase their value to society through contribution. Women only have their reproductive capacity. That's my point. Women only want the highest percentage of men. Men who aren't as attractive in most instances don't make enough money to compete. So they end up in the bottom of the barrel, you'd notice this more without monogamy but it still exists. Women have their fun through younger years with alphas, and then hook on less desirable guys later. A man can't sell his reproductive ability very often so if he's a loser he's doomed. That's what these white knights are who simp out to women. Women can sell their sex even if they're losers. The problem is when they're ugly. They can get losers to fling with them but no man wants to buy them, although again with the simping even they can have an inflated ego and often do.
|
|
|
Post by JACK-2 on Jul 14, 2015 11:09:30 GMT -5
I see. Yeah, monogamy is just socialized sex. I think if you're a low value male than prostitution eould be a better alternative. I saw an article complaining about people who equate polygamy to gay marriage are wrong. Because according to them monogamy is good because it protects low value males. Its so dumb, we don't need marriage anymore because DNA test and contraception elminates most of the complications of sex. People need to get with the times. Sex is a commodity which the free market should regulate.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Jul 14, 2015 11:21:33 GMT -5
I see. Yeah, monogamy is just socialized sex. I think if you're a low value male than prostitution eould be a better alternative. I saw an article complaining about people who equate polygamy to gay marriage are wrong. Because according to them monogamy is good because it protects low value males. Its so dumb, we don't need marriage anymore because DNA test and contraception elminates most of the complications of sex. People need to get with the times. Sex is a commodity which the free market should regulate. Exactly. Prostitution and sex toys along with the internet solves that problem. In the past there was no contraception or dna testing and men wanted an heir. Those times are over since it's a trap for men now. People always want what's in their self interest and they'll come up with BS to regulate it. I remember Peter Schiff arguing with a lesbian about that. If consenting adults want to have a sexual arrangement it's nobody else's business. My thing is if we get rid of monogamous nonsense we'd have to get rid of wealth transfers from men to women like alimony, child support, and welfare. That way it's fully free and not slanted in their favor. Right now we have the losers and the filth reproducing and then I end up paying for it.
|
|