The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Nov 17, 2006 16:38:28 GMT -5
sloths are just boring.. they just hang onto trees with no passion. now a husky is just adorable, Sloths move you know!
|
|
|
Post by jubilee on Nov 19, 2006 14:57:53 GMT -5
yes they let one hand go off the tree scratch their arse they change hands,, how boring
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Nov 23, 2006 23:47:07 GMT -5
people need to start making more threads. what animals do you all like? any animal match is fine I preferr mammals how ever I know a lot about most all animals
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 9, 2006 0:52:07 GMT -5
This reminds me of something in Biology class last year. We were watching a National Geographic video about rainforests, when we came upon a now-infamous scene known as "Eagle vs. Sloth".
It shows the eagle soaring with dramatic music pounding...
Then jumps to the lazy sloth in a tree...
Then back to the eagle and pounding music...
Quiet sloth...
EAGLE!...
Slooooooth...
Then the eagle slams into the sloth and there's this really loud sound like "BOOFA!". I laughed my ass off. It was so one-sided. We rewound it and watched it like eight times. _____________________________________________________
Wolves are highly overrated in my opinion. I do not find them cool nor mysterious. _____________________________________________________
Shrews are cumulatively the most deadly species on the planet. _____________________________________________________
Though not my favorite, I find dolphins fascinating because they are one of the few species besides humans which are capable of rape and murder. _____________________________________________________
My favorite animal would have to be the skink.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 9, 2006 1:11:00 GMT -5
This reminds me of something in Biology class last year. We were watching a National Geographic video about rainforests, when we came upon a now-infamous scene known as "Eagle vs. Sloth". It shows the eagle soaring with dramatic music pounding... Then jumps to the lazy sloth in a tree... Then back to the eagle and pounding music... Quiet sloth... EAGLE!... Slooooooth... Then the eagle slams into the sloth and there's this really loud sound like "BOOFA!". I laughed my ass off. It was so one-sided. We rewound it and watched it like eight times. _____________________________________________________ Wolves are highly overrated in my opinion. I do not find them cool nor mysterious. _____________________________________________________ Shrews are cumulatively the most deadly species on the planet. _____________________________________________________ Though not my favorite, I find dolphins fascinating because they are one of the few species besides humans which are capable of rape and murder. _____________________________________________________ My favorite animal would have to be the skink. Wolves are liked by alot of people, but I still find their look and nature very cool.
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 9, 2006 1:48:32 GMT -5
Well I don't see the appeal in them. There are so many cooler creatures, like moon jellies and mongolian deathworms.
|
|
|
Post by warmunger on Dec 18, 2006 20:33:45 GMT -5
Turtles and bats are cool too.Mainly because of the Ninja Turtles and Batman, although both animals can be amazing on their own.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 18, 2006 21:45:42 GMT -5
Turtles and bats are cool too.Mainly because of the Ninja Turtles and Batman, although both animals can be amazing on their own. I saw a turtle not too long back, and I was pondering keeping it.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 19, 2006 0:09:14 GMT -5
tiger>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>wolf
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 19, 2006 0:27:08 GMT -5
Monitor lizard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tiger.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 19, 2006 0:30:17 GMT -5
Monitor lizard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tiger. Komodo Dragon pwns all!
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 19, 2006 0:33:18 GMT -5
No, there are coller monitor lizards than the komodo. This pet store had this really neat blue one, for like $5000. That thing was so cool.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 19, 2006 0:36:55 GMT -5
No, there are coller monitor lizards than the komodo. This pet store had this really neat blue one, for like $5000. That thing was so cool. Did it talk? Because if it did, it's mine... I lost it.
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 19, 2006 0:41:44 GMT -5
I lost all my Z-Bots.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 21, 2006 0:33:18 GMT -5
Monitor lizard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tiger. ? what the hell is that? doubt it would beat a tiger though. crocs don't fair well vs tigers in or out of water
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 21, 2006 9:02:15 GMT -5
Monitor lizard >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tiger. ? what the hell is that? doubt it would beat a tiger though. crocs don't fair well vs tigers in or out of water A Croc could take a Hippo in the water.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 21, 2006 12:43:37 GMT -5
? what the hell is that? doubt it would beat a tiger though. crocs don't fair well vs tigers in or out of water A Croc could take a Hippo in the water. debatable really. Those are also nile croc which are also known as salt water croc the largest of all crocs I have video footage of a tiger taking one out of water and in water
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 21, 2006 15:13:38 GMT -5
A Croc could take a Hippo in the water. debatable really. Those are also nile croc which are also known as salt water croc the largest of all crocs I have video footage of a tiger taking one out of water and in water I have seen Crocs take Hippos out in the water which would murder a Tiger.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 21, 2006 16:28:21 GMT -5
debatable really. Those are also nile croc which are also known as salt water croc the largest of all crocs I have video footage of a tiger taking one out of water and in water I have seen Crocs take Hippos out in the water which would murder a Tiger. pure speculation on your part. hippo take crocs more then the other way around. hippo would not take a tiger out of water. Hell a tiger has taken elephants before and trust me no croc has manage that feat.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 21, 2006 18:44:05 GMT -5
I have seen Crocs take Hippos out in the water which would murder a Tiger. pure speculation on your part. hippo take crocs more then the other way around. hippo would not take a tiger out of water. Hell a tiger has taken elephants before and trust me no croc has manage that feat. Crocs take their much larger victims out by drowning them, it isn't speculation but fact. Even creatures like Elephants can die in this manner, that is why they don't stay in certain waters for long. They continuously move. A full grown Tiger will never take on a full grown elephant, to say otherwise is absurd. It can never reach the vital parts of an Elephant to kill it, and can't flip it over in the water or drown it like a croc can. That is common sense.
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 21, 2006 21:45:41 GMT -5
In Africa, more people are killed each year by hippos than crocs.
And a full-grown croc is quite capable of taking on a tiger in an amphibious environment. They are unlikely to, however, unless they were the only two animals around and ansolutely had to duke it out to eat. Not to mention it is doubtful that you will find the two species together.
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 21, 2006 23:45:46 GMT -5
.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 22, 2006 2:06:11 GMT -5
croc are not able to kill a full grown healthy elephant by the way
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 22, 2006 10:03:07 GMT -5
croc are not able to kill a full grown healthy elephant by the way Glad didn't say a tiger couldn't kill one and skipped it.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 22, 2006 14:42:35 GMT -5
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 22, 2006 16:23:39 GMT -5
I was clearly saying and referencing a full grown elephant. It doesn't take much common sense to know that 1 full grown tiger won't mess with one full grown healthy elephant. There have been tigers that have killed crocs and vice versa, so that's neither here nor there. The tiger has the advantage on land, but the disadvantage in water because they are slammed down and suffocated. Strength doesn't calculate the same in water due to boyuancy. I take it you know very little about hippos. Hippos do nto eat meat. The eat plants. There are extreme territorial and will attack any humans who tress pass. Where did I say they ate meat? They still get very hungry and they bite things without much regard. Their teeth grow quite long and their bites are some of the most powerful around. They also migrate as well to moister areas, but protect their young obviously. It isn't even common to spot a Tiger and a Hippo together, much less see a Tiger kill one, due to it's weight disadvantage. Tigers have been killed by weaker creatures as well. Crocs fear hippos and stay away from hippo territory and have been known to be killed by hippos, Crocs don't engage a pack of hippos because that would be stupid. Crocs are intelligent and loners and wait till one strays too far to engage it one on one. No not on average. How ever it has been seen and reported that tigers in India have killed full grown elephants by jumping on top of them. It un heard of, but it has happen before. They aren't tall enough to even jump on and kill a full grown elephant and reach it's vitals. The ones you must have been talking about are small and/or young. C'mon man.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 22, 2006 16:53:30 GMT -5
First you clearly implied a croc would defeat a tiger which is false. Tiger win the majority of the fights. Actually tigers will mess with full grown elephants how ever killing them is a different story.
Actually there no video footage of a tiger ever being beat by a croc. Tiger defeat crocs far more then lose. This is fact unless you have a way to disprove this.
Strength ahs nothing to do with it. Did you not see my videos? Tiger took it tio many crocs in the water to the point were they no longer wish to fight the croc. Tiger take the majority in either land or water. How ever tiger tend not to kill crocs when in water the croc tends to survive and flee.
. First off I never said it was.
Second off they don’t live near each other
Third off weight does not equal win.
. Strength again does not equal win. What have tiger been killed by again?
,
|
|
The Big Daddy C-Master
Big Daddy
Living life to the fullest, and it feels great.
I'm still here... for now...
Posts: 26,387
|
Post by The Big Daddy C-Master on Dec 22, 2006 17:58:46 GMT -5
First you clearly implied a croc would defeat a tiger which is false. Tiger win the majority of the fights. Firstly you clearly tried to imply a tiger would kill an elephant, and anyone here with over 5 braincells knows that’s baloney. We’re not arguing what can happen in the tiniest of possibilities, it is more or less a “who you would bet on” stipulation. Then I confronted your post and you contantly changed it instead of admitting you were wrong in the first place. On the second topic at hand, I said a tiger would get the most wins on land (hell a human can wrestle a crocodile on land), but not in water, because the Tiger loses most of it’s maneuverability in water and is at a disadvantage, while a Croc is at a major advantage, just like the Tiger has an advantage on land. I’m not the only one who realized this. Actually tigers will mess with full grown elephants how ever killing them is a different story. When was I arguing just confronting them? I was arguing them not having a chance, and now you try to keep implying different meanings as you go along, hoping I don’t catch you. Actually there no video footage of a tiger ever being beat by a croc. Yes, I’m sure you’ve seen every piece of footage to date. Tiger defeat crocs far more then lose. This is fact unless you have a way to disprove this. It is fact because you say so? The *fact * is that Tigers lose much of their maneurverability in power within deep waters, while a Crocodile has the advantage. Strength ahs nothing to do with it. Did you not see my videos? Tiger took it tio many crocs in the water to the point were they no longer wish to fight the croc. Tiger take the majority in either land or water. How ever tiger tend not to kill crocs when in water the croc tends to survive and flee. Actually I was going to take your word for it, but I always learned to do my own research and watching. The land scene is legit, but why did you post a movie scene? Common man, that is losing your credibility, I can’t even believe you did that, but I won’t insult you or anything like that. The deeper the water the more likely the Tiger loses. And strength is a big part of it, or else how would they kill anything? Do Tigers run around with guns now? They can’t outstealth a Croc in water, it’s the contrary actually. Secondly Crocs aren’t “Fight to the death” type animals, they’ll even go so far as to avoid humans. That doesn’t mean they aren’t capable of killing them does it? First off I never said it was. Go and point exactly where I said you did that, I’ll be waiting. Second off they don’t live near each other Which I already said. Third off weight does not equal win. Weight plays a big advantage in any fight. Weight means thicker build, more natural leverage, and that it’s harder to take down. Reduce a Tiger to the size of a kitten and it loses. A tiger would have a hard time getting a sufficient bite on most parts of an elephant because it is too thick. Do you know why they *have * Elephant guns? Strength again does not equal win. What have tiger been killed by again? Just as you can put low showings up for a croc, there have been times that Tigers have been killed by relatives of deer or other cats. You seem to think Tigers are invincible. Yes and no. I did sonme research I was mistaken they take older ones and sick ones. It not on common for them to attack a health full grown elephant it just then never kill them how ever they do injure the elephants. There is one report of two juveniles tigers killing a full grown healthy elephant how ever. Of course they would only attack weaker and sicker creatures. That’s how most lone animals hunt. I’d have to see a Tiger pounce on a full grown African Elephant. Indian Elephants are much smaller.
|
|
|
Post by EsteemedLeader© on Dec 23, 2006 5:38:11 GMT -5
Kuwabara, you're talking out your ass.
You can not back up one single thing you have said.
Your arguments are falling apart faster than a leper in a tornado. When you want to talk about facts, you have to bring me actual FACTS. And when you give me evidence, you have to give me actual EVIDENCE.
|
|
|
Post by kuwabara on Dec 24, 2006 4:14:48 GMT -5
.
|
|